Review: The Library: A Fragile History





 Book: The Library: A Fragile History

Authors: Andrew Pettegree and Arthur der Weduwen

Release Date: Oct 14, 2021

Disclaimer: ARC via Netgalley

               In case you missed it, this week (the week of Sept 6, 2021) a man tweeted about how people virtue signal with large libraries and that you really shouldn’t own more than x number of books (or have x number of shelf space) and that he didn’t believe people read more than two books a week. Needless to say the vast amount of book lovers called him out  - and then he accused them of bragging about the number of books they read and virtue signaling.  Then accused them of not going to the library.  Which is strange because most readers buy a lot of books and borrow from the library.  Not to mention, in some areas, local libraries are either very small or very far away.

               Anyway, he doesn’t get libraries of any type really or readers for that matter. 

               Lucky, we have books like this one by Pettegree and der Weduwen that not only get libraries, but also get readers and those who love libraries, be they personal or public.

               Pettegree and de Weduwen chronicle the raise of the personal if elitist library and then move to the advent of the public library.  The bulk of the history on the library in the Western World, therefore mostly Europe and America (why is Canada always overlooked, I mean really, unless it is hockey or maple syrup).

               That said, the book is a pretty good overview.  The coverage of the Medieval Period is well done, and includes women who developed personal libraries as well as men.  They focus on the Dutch who owned personal libraries in the periods of the Renaissance and Reformation, and move into the modern era where they discuss not only the development  of the public library, especially in regards to the Carnegie libraries.

               There is a particularly good section that discusses the rise in women readers as well as the popularity of romance novels.  Considering how little respect the romance genre and romance readers do seem to get from various histories and commenters on books, it was a nice nod to see two authors highlight the positivity of the genre.

               The subtitle comes because the focus is on the tragedies of losing libraries.  The loss of Alexandria is covered, of course; but the authors include other, less well known losses. The modern era could use a bit more development in terms of the section about the attempts of book challenges and bans that occur, not just in the US.  It should be noted that bans and challenges are covered as are librarcides.

               The book is readable and engrossing.  It is a quick and excellent history.  Well worth the read, and the owning of, if you like books.

Comments