I live in a neighborhood that has anarchists. Granted, my philosophy is different, and I
don’t quite understand why an anarchist would always have the most up to date computer,
but hey, they seem pretty nice even if they smell of pot much of the time.
That’s
my view of anarchists, who are usually squatters in my neck of the woods.
Needless
to say, those types of Anarchists are not the ones that Merriman is writing about. Merriman’s history is about the bandits that committed
crimes during pre-WWI France, but it is also about the anarchist movement in
France at the time.
Merriman
opens his book with the holdup of the Société Générale. This is the Bonnot Gang. Of course, like most criminal’s people who
were not involved with the crime spree where caught in the net. It is two of these – Victor Kibaltchiche and
Riette Maitrejean.
Merriman
takes him time in laying the foundation for the action. He provides more detail of the Belle Époque
period, showing the trends and political movements that gave rise to the
Anarchist movement as well as the various threads of that movement – illegal
activity vs philosophy.
For
that is what sometimes gets lost in a discussion of anarchists, at least in the
media. They become simply bomb throwing,
gun shooting radicals who populate the media.
Merriman’s book illustrates that in some cases it was a life style,
including vegetarianism and foregoing of items such alcohol and salt.
Maitrejean
and Kibaltchiche are at the heart of the story, for they seemed to have known
everyone, and part of the drama of the story is the dragnet that captures are in
its wake, regardless of involvement or not.
It is their fate and the fate of their family that moves the story
forward. Merriman’s prose is
invigorating enough to carry the reader along.
There are also little details, such as the horror of balsamic vinegar that
actually illustrate the dedication to the cause. Honesty, you must strongly
believe in something if you are willing to give up such a wonderful thing. Such small details actually make the history
more interesting and in some ways more real.
Considering
the current political climate, the book might be timelier than intended. It is also to Merriman’s credit that he does not
romanticize the Illegalistes. Despite
the title the book isn’t one of the romantic retellings of an outlaw life. In many ways, while the reader does end up
feeing some sympathy for the bandits, or at least a few of them, the cost to
others not involved in the Illegalistes is not ignored. This is done by the not only the use of
outsiders but also by showcasing the debates within the movement itself.
Comments
Post a Comment