Journal 1 - Book 1 Trial of Lady Chatterley

The original edition 

 


Started in Copenhagen, Denmark.

These early entries do not always include page numbers.

 

 6/20/2000

The Trial of Lady Chatterley: Regina v Penguin Books Limited Ed. By C. H. Ralph  [Note – this book, an edition published soon after the trial, was purchased at a library sale near the Round Tower]

 

Round Tower

               How could the Crown except to win the case when the Defense called upon people who had helped to write the law as supporters for their case?

               Defense witnesses do make some good points about the book, authors, and society in general.

               Graham Hough, in reply to prosecutor asking him that authors are expect to quote accurately, “No, sir. From my knowledge of the habits of authors it is the last thing I would except, for them to quote accurately.  They do it from memory and they always get it wrong” – very true -avoid this

 

               Dr James Hemming on society, sex, and young people:

“Well, today, young people are subjected to a constant titillation  and insinuation of what I would describe as shallow and corrupting values with regard to sex and the relationships between he sexes.  For example, the picture is put before the young girl that if she has the right proportions, wears the right clothes, uses the right cosmetics, she will become irresistible to men and that  is the supreme achievement of a woman.  On the other hand, the general effect of this titillation and insinuation so far as the young man is concerned is to suggest that sex is little more than a physical thrill that to have a pretty woman in one’s arms is the supreme ecstasy of life, and that to seduce a woman is manly and something to be attempted for yourself and to be envied in others” (118)

 

So society hasn’t changed that much.  But the scary thing is that movies can get away with such behavior.  True movies are taken to task nut never to the degree that books are.  Books are banned!  Is that because the pen is mightier than the sword?  But then  news says things about kids not reading so where is the danger?  And how come people divide what to ban books but never movies.  Huck Finn the book is banned in some areas but the movie can still be shown.  Do people do more than just read the book?  How come wit the books professional opinion Nevers seems to count in the US.

               Does the written word influence society , influence us that much or is some residual fear from when the printing press came into existence?

               One has to admire Penguin for not publishing the expurgated version of the book.

 

               Miss Dibys Powell asked how book differs from other novels, tv, and movies in regards to portrayal of sex, “It is on a very much higher moral plane.  I regard it as an extremely moral book, a great proportion of the books I read and the films I see and the television I watch seems to have a degrading influence, and a great deal of the contemporary cinema seems to degrade the whole sanity of sex, treating as something trivial.  But in Lawrence’s books, which has a great elements of sacredness, sex is taken as being something to be taken seriously and as a basis for holy life.” (150)

               DAMN STRAIGHT!

 

               Cecil Day-Lewis wrote detective fiction under the name Nicholas Blake!  Wonder what people said about that.  [NOTE – the trial outs this fact]

               What hadn’t the persecution called witnesses?  They could have found at least one critic that would’ve agreed with them.  Not every critic can think the same thing about a novel.  Prosecution appears to have been so unprepared, its laughable.  They most have thought it would have been easy.


Comments