Journal 1 - Swans, Shakespeare, and Vampires

 

8/8/2000

The Black Swan  by Mercedes Lackey



               Siegfried’s response of what he would od it as an old man he discovered his young wife having an affair, “I shall magnanimously forgive her and send Lancelot packing to a monastery, probably singing soprano so he won’t be tempted by the sin of lust again” (62).

               Very good and one of her better novels.  Good progression in the characters of Odile and Siegfried.  Nice that Odette gets fleshed out as well.

               The growth of the prince is seen from his repentance of his “rape” of the gypsy  girl .  Is then believable that he and Odette fall in love.  The change in Odile is seen as well, illustrated by the journey and her relationship with the girls.  Her anger at the father is building throughout the whole book.

               The flock seems to be somewhat underdeveloped, too vague and identical.

               Like the ending.  It is a beginning and yet is left up to the reader’s imagination.  It is good that Lackey only hints at a romantic relationships between Beano and Odile, and doesn’t force it to happen quickly.  So the reader can imagine the romance happening after the end of the book.

               Like Odile’s notice of her father not punishing the fragility of men.  Also interesting how women progress in regard throughout the novel.  Thanks to Odette and Odile the prince and others no longer see women as things.  The prince was already changing in this view and hints further change with first Odile and then Odette in the council.

               The Baron would not follow this change because his view of women as faithless creatures.  Nor could Clotilde, though she wanted power, she could not get in the world of men.  She is not willing to let her son take over and tries to control him.  There is no reason to presume that Siegfried wouldn’t have given her a position his council.  Both the Baron and the queen use their power to keep change from occurring, to keep their power in the current form that they have it.  The Baron is just as guilty as the Queen for he does not love his daughter in the same the queen does not love her son.  They use/control their children.  Some of the crimes that the queen is accused of by the Baron also apply to him.

               It is the ones who change, Odile, Siegfried, and others who survive and flourish.  Not because of the young vs old, for Wolfgang changes but changeability vs rigidness.

 

8/9/2000

Path of the Eclipse by Chelsea Quinn Yarbro

[Note- Count St. Germain series]

               T’ian is very much like Rangaude from Better in the Dark.  Both women outside the traditional bounds of the accepted role in society.  The count’s desire to keep these women alive is strange.  T’ian turned down his offer to change her before he battle and he never made such an offer to Rangedaude.  He wants them to forgo their honors so their lost love does not disturb him.

               Nice to see that his relationship with Pardemi ended well.  As well as the fat that she was an older woman.

               Count seems to be drawn to outsiders like himself, finding them more attractive than the women who accept their role in society.

               What are the ghouls only men?

               She should write a book about the Count’s early years.

               Interesting to not that when Pardemi asked him if he loved both men and woman he answered yes.  Yet in his catalog of lost loves only women are mentioned.  Did he lack something with men>

               Interesting tie-in with the letters.

 



8/11/2000

Stratford-Upon-Avon Studies: Shakespearean Comedy ed David Palmer and Malcolm Bradley

 

“The Presentation of Comedy: The First Ten Plays” by John Russell Brown

                He does not exactly describe what he means by a disinterested viewer of the paper.  Also he sees Claudio’s emotions for Hero as pure and shy.  I don’t think he is correct about the disinterested viewer.  Also his reading of Twelfth Night seems not to be well done.

 

“Were man but constant, he wee perfect: Constancy and Consistency in The Two Gentleman of Verona” by Inga-Stina Eubank

               Interesting read of Verona, comparing to the sonnets but it still offers no solution to the play.

 

“Shakespeare without Sources” by Stanley Wells

               Why don’t Titania and Bottom count as lovers? Because of the love flower with Titania is subjected to?

               Good point in comparing The Tempest to romance but condensed in space and tone.

               Interesting comparison of watching of plays in both Love Labors Lost and A Midsummer’s Night Dream is trying to show the correct way to behave at the play.

 

“Grace, Art, and the Neglect of Time in Love Labor’s Lost” by John Dixon Hert

               Didn’t read it because I really dislike the play.

 

“The Merchant of Venice  or the Importance of Being Earnest” By D J Palmer

                Don’t exactly buy his theory that Portia is not marrying a stranger while Jessica does.  Portia is in fact marrying a stranger who seeks her funds.  The use of the caskets seems to be the only way to insure that Portia marries a stranger, Jessica at least knows Antonio.  Portia desires (sexually) Bassano.

               Portia trying to save her husband’s friend is not acting out of self interest?

               Seems to disregard Jessica as the “bad” way to marriage.  But Jessica rebels against unjust/uncaring father, Portia follows the strange marriage rules.

               Do not agree with is reading of Bassano, makes him too innocent.  Bassano to me has always seemed lacking.  Not truly heroic, but a user.

 

“The Owl and the Cuckoo: Voices of Maturity in Shakespeare’s Comedies” by R. A Toakes

               On Jacques in As You Like It, “He can equally be seen as a “comic pointer’ exposing the folly of others, of courtiers living in the woods” (122).

               Always wonder about that detail myself.

               Good observation on Much Ado About Nothing.  Never saw Hero and Claudio’s love as a social declaration.  Plays makes more sense that way.

               On Beatrice and Benedick, “The point is that the witty poise they begin from, and only lose in flashes that revel the strength of their feelings, includes and transcends such a relationship as Claudio and Hero can hope for” (132).

               Not sure that I agree with reading of Theseus.  Thesis always seemed to want to hurry the marriage along.

 

“Shakespeare’s Fools: The Shadow and the Substance of Dreams” by Gareth Llyod Evans

               Interesting concept of fool and influence of the part upon the actor.

 

“As You Like It and Twelfth Nigh: Shakespeare’s Sense of Ending” by Anne Burton

She does not seem to get to her point and there does not seem to be too well supported.

 

“Theatrical Trompe l’oeil in Measure for Measure”  by Joselyn Powell

               Makes the play somewhat clearer.

 

“Two Unassailable Men” by A D Nutall

               Don’t know if I would classify The Tempest as a comedy.

 

Comments