Bathory |
8/22/2000
The Vampire Sextette ed. By Marvin Kaye
“The Other Side of Midnight” by Kim Newman
[Note: this story is set in his Anno-Dracula universe, a
what if world where Mina and Co didn’t kill Dracula].
I didn’t not realize that Welles lived until 1985. I always thought he had died sooner.
Love the
re-appearance of Genevieve [Note- the heroine vampire from Anno-Dracula]. She fits the private detective role quite
well. I was not all that thrilled about
the appearance of Columbo. But love the
Barbie the Vampire Salyer. It’s great
because I can see Anthony Head play her overlooker. Though the idea of the Beverly Hill Billies
as cannibals was very gothic.
But I am
unclear or uncertain over the idea of the drac, which seem too self destructive
to the vampire itself, especially given what keeps them alive. Isn’t that why they have to feed? I would
have really liked to see Genevieve kicking the stuffing out of Barbie.
“Some Velvet Morning” by Nancy Collins
[Note: this is a Sonja Blue story. At this point I had not read Sonja Blue].
I think I need to try and find some of her Sonja Blue
novels.
I love
the use of the Countess Bathroy [Note: the Blood Countess] and how it was told from the other side. The central placing of that part of the story
makes the whole story seem, in essence,
like a fairy tale. The characters are
very much fairy tale characters, acting out the tale that Elizabeth is
telling. For instance, it is Elizabeth
who takes control fo the story by ending her own life. Elizabeth has set up the characters in her
story (Phaedra being very much a character in that story). When Sonja and the john who refuse to come,
take control away, Elizabeth wrestles it back by killing herself, Phaedra, and
the old brothel. Elizabeth sees to the
destruction of her own creations. In
this story, Sonja is secondary, though she is the only good “guy”.
The
beginning is great with its movement from sex to blood.
“Sheena” by Brian Stableford
First
off, just so we are clear, Manchester is the only true English United.
I love
the story because of the use English slang and place names. The love between Sheena and the narrator
seems very real, almost tangible. The
death of Sheena was portrayed low key and, therefore, felt more real.
But
while the vampire element seems to be unclear, the ending is horrifying because
of the life times the narrator must go though before he can see Sheena again. Perhaps the reason for the confusion of the
vampire type is because we are not sure of the narrator is one at the end of the
story. Perhaps he has lost touch with
reality.
“Vanilla Blood” by S. P. Somtov
Just
plain sick.
The prose
moves from teen speech to poetic. The
reader loses sense of the speaker. The
story does seem to have a theme and good comments on the media in the beginning
but then just goes downhill. It seems
more like a boy’s fantasy than anything a woman would like, especially with the
degrading terms for women and the sex scenes.
“In the Face of Blood” by Chelsea Quinn Yarbro
[Note: this story features Madeline of the Count St.
Germain novels]
Madeline
is not as engaging as Olivia. She seems
more egotistical, spoiled, unwilling to see other’s viewpoint and not simply
because those viewpoints are sexist.
Sherman’s remarks about the Native Americans, for instance. She also seems stupid.
And I
don’t see how she could have access to her father’s fortune after she died.
And if
she found being a vampire that depressing, why doesn’t she kill herself. At least the Count doesn’t complain about it
so much as she does. She also seems more
accepted by society than Olivia did or even the Count.
Why does
no question her about her supposedly dead husband?
The
affair with Sherman seems to be forced, and she seems too passive and
accepting. No fire. She lacks a personality.
“The Isle Is Full of Noise” by Tanith Lee
Like
the juxtaposition f the story and real life, but it does seem somewhat convoluted.
8/24/2000
Duncton Stone by William Horwood
[Note: Book 3 of the Book of Silence, reread]
Hibbat
takes the place of a Ben-Hur character by being present at all the important events. There is some Christian imagery with Privet,
even though not every Christian believes in transubstantiation. Hibbat functions to show the lives of the
other moles are touched by Privet and Rooster, yet never see it presented in
much detail. The love of Fieldfare and
Chater, Stourne and Myrtle, and of Rees and Avril seems more real than Rooster
and Privet’s love. Their love feels just
like a plot point as does the matting of Loosestrife and Wilhelm.
Poor Chervil
and Sampson both of whom, Privet never concerns herself with either of them,
even though Chervil saves Wilhelm. Her concerns when she is sick is all for
Loosestrife, the favoritism that her mother committed and Privet condemns is
something that Privet herself is guilty of.
Parts of
the book are strange, the distance that grows between Macdoc and Wilhelm relieves
that their love wasn’t that strong to begin with. Does Wilhelm or the other ever contact
Chervil? Chervil seems to disappear, to
not be cared for, and no reason is given for this. We have seen that he can form friendships
with moles (Feldspar) but his relatives do not seem to want to know, except for
Sampson who does not seem wanted and Dauntless, who Chervil wanted. In this Privet is as guilty as her
mother. Her unconcern for Wilhelm at the
moment of his supposed death is chilling.
Is it truly right not to care?
Strange
how all the main characters with the exception of Chater and Stour (who you
knew would die) survived and how most for the minor characters died. The ending seems too pat. You survive and everything works out unless
your uncared for as Chervil and Sampson.
And Chervil should have been mentioned at the end as well as Clunic.
Weeth is
like Marigold.
8/28/2000
Music and Silence by Rose Tremain
Christian IV |
Hasn’t
Christian IV lost his eye by now? [Note: he is a Danish king who lost an eye
in battle. There was, still might be, a
tapestry in the royal palace depicting the blood gushing from his eye]. He’s not that ugly. He lost the eye in 1644.
I like
this line on a mirror, “But there is an error in it, an undoubted fault in it
silvering, so that the wicked object makes me look fat. I have sent for a hammer” (7). But isn’t that bad luck?
“Why do
husbands refused to understand that we women do not for long remain their pet
creatures?” (8). Because like the
speaker at the adjunct meeting said men do want their brides to change.
It’s not
Elsinore but Helsingor.
“Denmark
is a watery kingdom. People dream that
it is the ships of a great navy which
tether the land” (10)
“. . .
because Denmark is a watery kingdom with a thousand lakes, it therefore follows
that reflections of heaven are here more numerous than anywhere else on earth
and these reflections, long seen with the eyes of the people and kept in the
hearts of the people make them love both God and nature and so they are quiet
and when you are King, you will be able to rule them and have their
trust”(17-18).
Book is
beautifully written and the plot relatively simple, though toward the end
suspenseful. The reader is somewhat
disconnected from the characters because of the prose style. The factual style of McKiernan crossed with
the poetic style of {A.s}Byatt or [Tanith]Lee.
The only
character that one fully knows is Kirsten and her pride/demanding attention
gets in the way. Christian IV is
portrayed sympathetically almost like a King Arthur figure yet with the happy
ending of finding true love.
Comments
Post a Comment