Major Points from the Refutation of The Betrayal of Anne Frank

 Link to full video and paper is here .  It includes at the bottom of the page the report as well as the remarks from the granddaughter.  I highly recommend that you read both.

The Dutch publisher has pulled the book, but HarperCollins has not.  ( see here and here)

Prof. Bart Wallet of the University of Amsterdam presented an overview before the group took questions from the audience. After the questions, the granddaughter of Arnold van den Bergh, Mirjam de Gorter spoke.  Some important issues and charges she covered include – the charge that both Sulivan and the Cold Case misrepresented what she said and that she never agreed with their conclusions, her rejection of the book’s conclusion, suggests that the interviews as reported in the book were manipulated, the original email from the team simply said they were doing research on Jews in hiding,  and that she brought to the team’s attention books that her grandfather attention which they dismissed.  Ruben Vis followed, commenting on the impact of the book on the Jewish community as well as making a connection to antisemitism.

               By the end of the presentation, news had broken about the Dutch publisher stopping the printing of the book.

               The refutation runs around 68 pages and is divided into chapters, which are written by a different group member or members.  The first chapter, “Arnold van den Bergh: A Profile” was written by Prof. Dr. Bart Wallet of the University of Amsterdam.    Wallet’s chapter is a belief biography of Van den Bergh up until his joining of the Jewish Council.  Wallet notes that Van den Bergh helped family members, finding evidence of his help in thirteen cases  for his extended family, a “high number” (11) according to Wallet.  Additionally, Wallet contends  that the Vanden Bergh, his wife, and his twin daughters found their hiding place because his niece (11).  Wallet also notes that the family tried to flee to the UK (11) and that Van den Bergh was able to transfer some of his assets aboard (11).

               The next chapter is “The Excise Duties of the notary Arnold van den Bergh” by Dr. Raymond Schütz, who has done work on Dutch notaries during WWII as well as working for archives.  Schütz challenges the Cold Case Team’s views as Van den Bergh as an art dealer who had connections to the Nazis [Wallat in the previous chapter notes that many people said Van den Bergh had a “hatred of Germans” (11)].  Additionally, it is noted that the money Van den Bergh earned for the Goudstikker sale was the norm for the work (21).

               Chapter three is entitled, “Van den Bergh and the Calmeyer procedure” by Dr. Petra van den Boomgard whose Ph.D. research concerned the Calmeyer issues.  She notes that Van den Bergh was registered as a full Jew (23).  More importantly that 2,650 Jews were able to escape using the registration act, in part because of  the Calmeyer procedure because it cast doubts on whether or not a person was Jewish (23).  Of the 4670 who applied for the certificate, ¾ survived the war (23).  Dr. van den Boomgard notes that until later in the war the department usually supported the claims and that the review of status primary depended on having a good lawyer as opposed to connection to the Nazis (24).    A rejection of an application usually resulted in the applicant going into hiding (26).

               Chapter four, written by Dr. Bart van der Boom of Leiden University and Dr. Laurien Vastenhaut of NIOD Institute for War, Holocaust, and Genocide Studies in Amsterdam, details Van den Bergh and the Jewish Council.    They point out that Van den Bergh was not a founding member, powerful member, or high ranking member of the Jewish Council, noting that his position on the council was not one with contact with Germans or with weekly meetings (31-32).  They assert that the number of Jewish Council members that Rosemary Sullivan gives in the book (17, 500) is incorrect.  They believe that she meant employees, and note that the number would include family members of council officials.   More importantly, they also note that the deportation lists did not come from the Jewish Council but the Central Office for Jewish Immigration (33).

 

               Perhaps the most damning chapter is Chapter 5 “Van den Bergh and the Betrayal” by van der Boom and Vastenhaut as well.  The chapter focuses, in part, on the question of the note, pointing that the note in question, the one accusing van Bergh doesn’t prove the existence of the lists and that the note’s wording indicates lack of knowledge of the system of German persecution.  They also point out the investigation by Natasha Gerson that shows a misreading of Otto Frank’s appointment book, ruling the CCT claim that an entry was about visiting a prison. They also point out that the mail from Westbrook went directly to the addresses.  In other words, this chapter shoots down the main evidence from the book.  (Honesty, this chapter you should read for yourself).

               Chapter 6 by Aaldrick Hermans, a history teacher who does research about Jews in hiding offers an analysis of whether or not Van den Bergh was in hiding.  Additionally, it notes that the daughter who was arrested was not imprisoned in the place that CCT sites, but instead in Rotterdam.  More importantly, it covers proof that Van den Bergh and his wife were in hiding in 1944.

               The final chapter by Bart Wallet notes that Van den Bergh was not ostracized by the Jewish community, noting that he work on getting redress for the Jewish population.


Comments